Tantramar candidates debate local issues

Published Friday September 17th, 2010

Grass-roots issues at heart of all-party debate

By Yvon Gauvin
Times & Transcript staff

SACKVILLE - Apart from the occasional low blow, last night's all-party candidate debate for the riding of Tantramar was a model of decorum and proper behaviour.

It was anything but a knock down, fists-flying confrontation as incumbent PC candidate Mike Olscamp, Liberal candidate Beth Barczyk, Green candidate Margaret Tusz-King and NDP candidate Bill Evans shared a platform fielding questions from the nearly 200 young and old assembled at the Mount Allison University's Brunton Auditorium. The debate was moderated by Mt. A political science professor Dr. Tamara Small and was hosted by the Greater Sackville Chamber of Commerce and the Mt. A student council.

 

The session opened with the four candidates espousing party policies and what they would like to see happen in their riding.

Even the low blows were more in jest than harmful and were directed mainly at the party or the leader.

Not surprising, the concerns were mostly grass-roots issues from agriculture and the challenges facing farms to lobster fishing, health care, support for seniors, education and, of course, roads and infrastructure.

Olscamp chastised the Liberals for rash, reckless and sometimes questionable ventures while in office leading to a huge provincial deficit. It will be up to the Tories to bring balance back in the government and government books, he said. He also keyed on promoting local producers and education from the ground up including post-secondary education, familiar themes with all of the candidates.

Barczyk said the government is working for the future with the party platform for the Sept. 27 provincial elections reflecting that vision.

Tusz-King pointed out that neither the Liberals or Tories championed sustainability and the environment in their campaign platforms, something that is dear to the Green Party.

She also decried the loss of local decision-making with the disappearance of local school boards, hospital boards and others over the years. It's time to decentralize some of the administrations created since and let the communities make their own decisions, she said.

Evans would like to see corporate society pay its fair share with tax cuts going to middle-class working men and women who need it.

He also decried the pension increase and retirement bonus the MLAs voted for themselves, saying they should be ashamed.

In the end, all four acquitted themselves well with each scoring points but no one emerging as a clear winner in the debate.

Leader's Video Blog

Our Principles

> Non-Violence

A culture of cooperation, caring and understanding is essential to ending violence in our society. Rehabilitation rather than vengeance must be the goal of our justice system.

> Self-Determination and Citizenship

We must have the opportunity and the responsibility as citizens to contribute to the common good, which requires that all have the capacity to participate in community life.

> Social Justice and Equality

Everyone must have equal access to the necessities of life and be treated with dignity and respect. Treaties with First Nations must be honoured.

> Participatory Democracy

We must be able to participate in decisions that affect our lives and be guaranteed that our votes are reflected in the make-up of the Legislative Assembly.

> Local Self-Reliance

Our communities should be in control of their own destinies, supported by strong local economies, and sustained by local sources of food and renewable energy.

> Living within Our Ecological Means

We must live within the ecological limits of the Earth, while meeting our needs without threatening our children's future or the survival of other species.

Admin sign in